Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of characteristics and results at 6 and 12 months for the included non-equivalent groups design trials

From: Primary health care-level interventions targeting health literacy and their effect on weight loss: a systematic review

Study (Year)

Participants

Interventions

Follow-up (months)

Weight*/BMI**

Intervention group

Control group

Between-group significance

Pre mean

Post mean

Mean difference

Pre mean

Post mean

Mean difference

Bjorkelund 1991 [22]

Location: Sweden Setting: Community

Allocated: (a) 22 (b) 27 (c) 16

6

Wt

a.

88.1 (9.8)

NR

−3.98 (3.92)

87.3 (9.6)

NR

−1.77 (3.31)

p < 0.05

b.

70.2 (7.7)

NR

−2.83 (2.46)

70.9 (7.6)

NR

−0.42 (2.55)

p < 0.001

c.

90.6 (9.0)

NR

−2.87 (3.65)

88.8 (14.8)

NR

−1.41 (4.79)

NS

Risk factor: Nil

% dropout (at 6 months): (a) 0 (b) 4 (c) 6

BMI

a.

33.0 (3.0)

NR

−1.50 (1.60)

33.2 (3.5)

NR

−0.65 (1.28)

p < 0.05

b.

26.4 (1.8)

NR

−1.03 (0.95)

26.4 (2.5)

NR

−0.11 (0.96)

p < 0.001

c.

33.9 (3.1)

NR

−1.04 (1.31)

33.4 (3.2)

NR

−0.51 (1.88)

NS

Sex: all women

Comparison: Participants vs. non-participants of the intervention program, each in 3 groups: a. BMI ≥ 30 & W/H ratio < 0.82 b. BMI < 30 & W/H ratio ≥ 0.82 c. BMI ≥ 30 & W/H ratio ≥ 0.82

Age, range: 45-64

Rohrer 2008 [29]

Location: USA Setting: PHC

Allocated: (a) 71 (b) 55

12

Wt$

NR

NR

−18.8 (15.7)

NR

NR

0.87 (5.9)

p < 0.001

Risk factor: Nil

% dropout: (a) 18.4 (b) 18.2

Sex: (a) 50 women, 21 men (b) 38 women, 17 men

Comparison: Intensive structured vs. less intensive

Age, mean (SD): (a) 45.3 (11.6) (b) 48.9 (9.4)

  1. Wt: Weight.
  2. BMI: Body mass index.
  3. *kg.
  4. **kg/m2.
  5. Mean (SD).
  6. $Not based on an ITT analysis.