Open Peer Review Reports for: A single oral dose of a polyglucosamine influences the bioavailability of [9- 14 C]-Oleic acid in adult female Göttingen minipigs
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting .
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Jul 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Oct 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Milan Piya |
| 22 Oct 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip McTernan |
| 30 Dec 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicole Cnubben |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 30 Dec 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Feb 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicole Cnubben |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Feb 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Feb 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Mar 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s40608-016-0096-2 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
