| |
Mozambique 2011 (N = 11318)
|
Namibia 2007 (N = 8541)
|
Niger 2012 (N = 3889)
|
|
Characteristic
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
|
Age
|
1.190
|
(1.127, 1.256)
|
1.275
|
(1.202, 1.352)
|
1.334
|
(1.216, 1.462)
|
|
Age-squared
|
0.998
|
(0.997, 0.999)
|
0.997
|
(0.997, 0.998)
|
0.996
|
(0.995, 0.998)
|
|
Urban
|
1.296
|
(0.907, 1.853)
|
1.952
|
(1.471, 2.589)
|
3.083
|
(1.851, 5.135)
|
|
Wealth
|
1.209
|
(1.152, 1.268)
|
1.165
|
(1.125, 1.206)
|
1.272
|
(1.177, 1.376)
|
|
Wealth*Urban/rural
|
0.993
|
(0.938, 1.051)
|
0.918
|
(0.881, 0.956)
|
0.885
|
(0.798, 0.981)
|
| |
Nigeria 2008 (N = 26486)
|
Rwanda 2011 (N = 6178)
|
Senegal 2010/11(N = 4820)
|
|
Characteristic
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
|
Age
|
1.235
|
(1.197, 1.274)
|
1.125
|
(1.060, 1.193)
|
1.241
|
(1.155, 1.334)
|
|
Age-squared
|
0.998
|
(0.997, 0.998)
|
0.998
|
(0.997, 0.999)
|
0.998
|
(0.997, 0.999)
|
|
Urban
|
1.319
|
(0.999, 1.740)
|
1.226
|
(0.777, 1.938)
|
2.196
|
(1.231, 3.917)
|
|
Wealth
|
1.119
|
(1.093, 1.147)
|
1.186
|
(1.128, 1.250)
|
1.067
|
(1.017, 1.121)
|
|
Wealth*Urban/rural
|
1.007
|
(0.969, 1.047)
|
0.962
|
(0.898, 1.030)
|
0.980
|
(0.907, 1.059)
|
| |
Sierra Leone 2008 (N = 2960)
|
Swaziland 2006 (N = 4371)
|
Tanzania 2010 (N = 8426)
|
|
Characteristic
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
Odds ratios
|
95% CI
|
|
Age
|
1.001
|
(0.929, 1.089)
|
1.279
|
(1.214, 1.347)
|
1.279
|
(1.205, 1.358)
|
|
Age-squared
|
1.000
|
(0.999, 1.001)
|
0.997
|
(0.997, 0.998)
|
0.997
|
(0.996, 0.998)
|
|
Urban
|
1.715
|
(0.960, 3.065)
|
0.994
|
(0.610, 1.619)
|
3.129
|
(2.215, 4.421)
|
|
Wealth
|
0.955
|
(0.860, 1.060)
|
1.103
|
(1.064, 1.145)
|
1.257
|
(1.171, 1.350)
|
|
Wealth*Urban/rural
|
1.144
|
(1.000, 1.308)
|
0.996
|
(0.936, 1.060)
|
0.875
|
(0.803, 0.953)
|
- Models include: educational level, breastfeeding status, marital status, use of contraception, region of residence, and religion
