Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A secondary analysis examining the concordance of self-perception of weight and actual measurement of body fat percentage: The CRONICAS Cohort Study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giridhara R Babu
16 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane C. Berry
17 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
20 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Anthony L Bui
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
10 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane C. Berry
7 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Anthony L Bui
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
1 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s40608-019-0229-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement