A secondary analysis examining the concordance of self-perception of weight and actual measurement of body fat percentage: The CRONICAS Cohort Study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Apr 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giridhara R Babu|
|16 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diane C. Berry|
|17 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|20 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony L Bui|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|10 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diane C. Berry|
|7 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony L Bui|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|1 Apr 2019||Article published||10.1186/s40608-019-0229-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.