Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of studies

From: Primary health care-level interventions targeting health literacy and their effect on weight loss: a systematic review

Study (Year)

Selection bias

Allocation bias

Confounders

Blinding

Data collection methods

Withdrawals and dropouts

Category of quality

Randomised controlled trials

Barclay (2008) [21]

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Bo (2007) [23]

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Greaves (2008) [25]

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Kulzer (2009) [26]

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

McConnon (2007) [28]

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

Strong

Weak

Weak

Tsai (2010) [30]

Weak

Strong

Weak

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

Whittemore (2009) [31]

Moderate

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Non-Equivalent Groups Design trials/ Single group pre-post trials

Absetz (2007) [19]

Moderate

Weak

Strong

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

Arrebola (2011) [20]

Weak

Weak

Strong

Weak

Strong

Weak

Weak

Bjorkelund (1991) [22]

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

Gilis-Januszewska (2011) [24]

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Strong

Moderate

Weak

Laatikainen (2007) [27]

Moderate

Weak

Strong

Weak

Strong

Moderate

Weak

Rohrer (2008) [29]

Moderate

Weak

Strong

Weak

Strong

Strong

Weak

  1. Rating on study quality.
  2. Strong: No weak and at least 4 strong ratings.
  3. Moderate: 1 weak and <4 strong ratings.
  4. Weak: ≥2 weak ratings.