Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Obesity

Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intima-media thickness and arterial function in obese and non-obese children

  • Heidi Weberruß1Email author,
  • Raphael Pirzer2,
  • Birgit Böhm1,
  • Robert Dalla Pozza2,
  • Heinrich Netz2 and
  • Renate Oberhoffer1
BMC ObesityBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20163:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-016-0081-9

©  Weberruß et al. 2016

Received: 30 April 2015

Accepted: 6 January 2016

Published: 9 January 2016

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Obesity is an independent cardiovascular risk factor that contributes to the development of atherosclerosis. Subclinical forms of the disease can be assessed via sonographic measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and distensibility – both may already be altered in childhood. As childhood obesity increases to an alarming extent, this study compares vascular data of obese with normal weight boys and girls to investigate the influence of obesity on cIMT and distensibility of the carotid arteries.

Methods

cIMT and distensibility of 46 obese children (27 girls) aged 7–17 years were compared with measures of 46 sex- and age-matched normal weight controls. cIMT and distensibility were measured by B- and M-mode ultrasound and expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS). Arterial distensibility was defined by arterial compliance (AC), elastic modulus (Ep), stiffness index β (β), and local pulse wave velocity β (PWV β).

Results

Obese girls had significantly stiffer arteries compared with normal weight girls (Ep SDS 0.64 ± 1.24 vs. 0 ± 1.06, β SDS 0.6 ± 1.17 vs. -0.01 ± 1.06 p < .01, PWV β 0.54 ± 1.2 vs. -0.12 ± 1.05 p < .05). No significant differences were observed for boys. In multiregression analysis, BMI significantly influenced Ep, β and PWV β but not cIMT and AC.

Conclusions

Obese girls seemed to be at higher cardiovascular risk than boys, expressed by stiffer arteries in obese girls compared with normal weight girls. Overall, BMI negatively influenced parameters of arterial stiffness (Ep, β and PWV β) but not compliance or cIMT.

Keywords

Arterial stiffnessCardiovascular diseasePediatricsPreventionUltrasound

Background

Childhood obesity increases rapidly in modern developed countries, which leads to adverse effects on children’s health [1]. Regarding the cardiovascular system, childhood obesity is claimed as metabolic fundament for atherosclerosis in adulthood [2, 3]. Subclinical indicators of atherosclerosis, like an increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and impaired arterial distensibility, can already be detected in childhood via ultrasound. Most studies report a significantly increased cIMT in obese children and adolescents compared with normal weight controls [4]. For arterial distensibility, findings are contradictory. Several studies report impaired parameters, hence increased arterial stiffness and reduced compliance [5–7], while others observed lower stiffness and higher compliance in obese children compared with normal weight controls [8–11].

So far, none of these studies addressed sex differences of cIMT and arterial distensibility in obese children. In the normal weight population, girls are reported to have higher arterial stiffness parameters than boys during pre-puberty, as well as women after menopause compared with men [12–14]. According to these findings, this study’s purpose was to investigate the influence of obesity on cIMT and distensibility in boys and girls.

Methods

Data collection was part of the prevention project “Sternstunden der Gesundheit”, a prospective cross-sectional study conducted from October 2012 to July 2013 in the area of Berchtesgadener Land, Germany. 1017 healthy children (483 boys/534 girls) aged 7–18 were examined to establish reference values for cIMT and parameters of arterial distensibility [15]. Children had no history of chronic disease or signs of acute infection. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Technische Universität München (5490/12), written informed consent was obtained from parents and from parents and children ≥ 14 years.

Out of the total study population, n = 46 children (27 girls) were obese, according to German reference values which define obesity as BMI SDS above the 97th percentile [16]. Obese children were compared with n = 46 sex- and age-matched normal weight controls.

Anthropometric measurements were performed by trained staff according to standardized guidelines [17]. Body weight was measured without shoes, wearing light clothes to the nearest 0.1 kg, body height was measured with a stadiometer (seca 799, seca, Hamburg, Germany), standing upright without shoes to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body-Mass-Index (BMI) was calculated from the ratio of mass (kg) to height2 (m2).

cIMT and distensibility were assessed using semi-automated B- and M-Mode ultrasound, (ProSound Alpha 6, Aloka/Hitachi Medical Systems GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) with a high frequency linear array probe (5–13 MHz). After 15 min rest patients were examined in supine position, the neck slightly extended and their head turned 45° opposite the site being scanned. cIMT was measured in B-Mode according to the Mannheim consensus [18] on the common carotid artery (CCA) far wall, 1 cm proximal to the bulb at end-diastolic moment. The cardiac cycle was simultaneously controlled with a 3 lead ECG. Of each subject, four measurements were performed, two on the left and two on the right CCA and calculated as average mean value of four measurements.

Distensibility was assessed in real time M-Mode with high precision vascular echo tracking at the same location than cIMT. Two tracking gates were placed on the CCA near and far wall which followed vessel wall motion, thereby calculating diameter change during heart cycles. Four video loops of at least five heart cycles were stored, two for the left and two for the right CCA. Distensibility parameters were calculated as average mean value of four measurements. As distensibility is pressure dependent [19], blood pressure (BP) was measured oscillometrically on the left arm (Mobil-O-Graph®, I.E.M., Stolberg, Germany) after 10 min rest, and applied in the calculation. Hypertension was defined as BP SDS above the 95th percentile according to German reference values [20].

CCA distensibility was defined by arterial compliance (AC), elastic modulus (Ep), stiffness index β (β) and local pulse wave velocity (PWV β) according to following formulae [21]:
$$ AC = \pi \left({D}_{ma{x}^2}-{D}_{mi{n}^2}\right)/\left[4\left(B{P}_{max}-B{P}_{min}\right)\right] $$
AC defines the ability of an artery to increase its volume in response to a given increase in blood pressure and is the inverse of arterial stiffness. It is calculated from changes in blood vessel cross-sectional area (D) and BP.
$$ Ep = \left(B{P}_{max}-B{P}_{min}\right)/\left[\left({D}_{max}-{D}_{min}\right)/{D}_{min}\right] $$
Ep increases with increasing vessel stiffness. The parameter is affected by BP.
$$ \beta = ln\left(B{P}_{max}\ /\ B{P}_{min}\right)/\left[\left({D}_{max}-{D}_{min}\right)/{D}_{min}\right] $$
Like Ep, β increases with increasing vessel stiffness, but is low in BP dependency.
$$ PWV\beta = \sqrt{\left(\left(\beta *B{P}_{min}\right)/\left(2\rho \right)\right)} $$

In general, PWV is the speed at which the forward pressure wave is transmitted from the aorta through the vascular tree. In this study, PWV β is assessed as CCA local pulse wave velocity, calculated from β.

All measurements were performed by two experienced examiners. The coefficient of variation (CV) between both examiners, assessed in 27 subjects, was 4.79 for cIMT, and 3.54 % for distensibility, calculated as average CV of AC (4.47 %), Ep (3.42 %), β (4.92 %) and PWV β (1.37 %).

BMI, BP, cIMT and distensibility measures were expressed as sex- and age-dependent standard deviation scores (SDS), calculated as follows:
$$ SDS = \frac{{\left(\frac{x}{M}\right)}^{L-1}}{L\ x\ S}\;\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\;\mathrm{L}\ne 0\kern0.24em \mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\kern0.24em SDS = \frac{ \ln \left(\frac{x}{M}\right)}{S}\;\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\;\mathrm{L}=0 $$

Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). After testing for normal distribution, differences between obese and normal weight children were analyzed by independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test, for boys and girls separately. The independent influence of BMI and BP on vascular data was analyzed by multivariate stepwise linear regression, and the association with BMI by bivariate correlation, controlled for sex, age, and BP. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and discussion

This subsample of 46 obese children and 46 sex- and age-matched controls was part of the prevention project “Sternstunden der Gesundheit”, a cross-sectional prospective study to establish reference values for cIMT and distensibility measures [15]. Out of the total study population (n = 1017 children), measurements of intima-media thickness and arterial distensibility were performed in 656 children (353 girls) of which 46 children (7 %) were obese (27 girls). Anthropometric and vascular data for normal weight and obese boys and girls are displayed in Table 1. Weight, BMI, and BMI SDS differed significantly between normal weight and obese boys and girls (p < .01), there were no significant differences in age, height and BP. Elevated systolic BP levels were present in 24 children (14 girls), elevated diastolic BP levels in 5 (1 girl) and both, elevated systolic and diastolic levles in 2 children (1 girl). 14 children with elevated systolic BP were obese (8 girls) and 10 were normal weight (6 girls). 4 children with elevated diastolic BP were obese (1 girl), and both subjects with elevated systolic and diastolic BP levels were obese.
Table 1

Anthropometric and arterial status of normal weight and obese boys and girls

 

Male (19/19)

Female (27/27)

Normal weight

Obese

Normal weight

Obese

AGE [yrs]

11.82

±

2.51

11.81

±

2.51

12.68

±

2.84

12.68

±

2.84

HEIGHT [cm]

149.83

±

14.38

157.73

±

16.34

153.71

±

14.62

155.45

±

10.12

WEIGHT [kg]

40.14

±

13.35**

69.91

±

21.99**

42.34

±

12.19**

70.17

±

17.83**

BMI SDS

−0.37

±

0.69**

2.22

±

0.25**

−0.56

±

0.52**

2.35

±

0.5**

BP systolic SDS

0.68

±

1.01

1.23

±

1.05

1.14

±

1.33

1.07

±

1.38

BP diastolic SDS

−0.14

±

1.32

0.55

±

1.02

0.08

±

1.19

0.15

±

1.26

IMT SDS

−0.05

±

0.94

0.03

±

1.39

0.07

±

1.09

0.23

±

0.83

AC SDS

−0.35

±

1.19

0.25

±

0.77

−0.15

±

0.92

0.04

±

1.47

Ep SDS

0.08

±

1.31

0.36

±

1.10

0.00

±

1.06*

0.64

±

1.24*

β SDS

0.23

±

1.28

0.23

±

1.00

−0.01

±

1.06**

0.60

±

1.17**

PWV β SDS

−0.04

±

1.19

0.34

±

1.00

−0.12

±

1.05*

0.54

±

1.2*

*p < .05, **p < .01

cIMT SDS did not differ significantly between normal weight and obese boys and girls. Mean cIMT SDS in normal weight boys were −0.05 ± 0.94 compared with 0.03 ± 1.39 in obese boys and 0.07 ± 1.09 in normal weight girls compared with 0.23 ± 0.83 in obese girls. In boys, distensibility parameters did not differ significantly between normal weight and obese participants. Obese girls, on the contrary had significantly increased stiffness parameters compared with normal weight controls (Table 1).

Multivariate stepwise linear regression revealed no significant independent influence of BMI and BP on cIMT. AC was affected by BP but not BMI. Measures of arterial stiffness (Ep, β and PWV β) were influenced by body dimensions, indicating stiffer arteries at a higher BMI (Table 2). In bivariate correlation, parameters of arterial stiffness were also significantly correlated to BMI after controlling for sex, age, and BP (Ep SDS: r = 0.26 β SDS: r = 0.25 and PWV β SDS: r = 0.25, p < .05).
Table 2

Stepwise multiregression analysis for measures of arterial distensibility with BMI and BP SDS

 

AC SDS R2 = 0.43

Ep SDS R2 = 0.3

β SDS R2 = 0.35

PWV β SDS R2 = 0.18

Beta ± SE

β

P

Beta ± SE

β

P

Beta ± SE

β

P

Beta ± SE

β

P

Constant

0.54 ± 0.12

 

.005

−0.37 ± 0.16

 

.02

0.19 ± 0.14

 

.2

−0.3 ± 0.16

 

.05

BMI SDS

   

0.18 ± 0.07

0.23

.013

0.16 ± 0.07

0.21

.019

0.17 ± 0.07

0.22

.025

Systolic BP SDS

−0.64 ± 0.08

−0.68

<.001

0.52 ± 0.1

0.54

<.001

0.38 ± 0.09

0.41

<.001

0.32 ± 0.09

0.35

<.001

Diastolic BP SDS

0.48 ± 0.08

0.5

<.001

−0.37 ± 0.1

−0.38

.001

−0.58 ± 0.9

−0.61

<.001

   

BMI indicates Body Mass Index, BP Blood Pressure. All measures are expressed as Standard Deviation Scores

This study compared the vascular status of 46 obese children to 46 age- and sex-matched normal weight controls, separately for boys and girls. Contrary to other studies [4], we did not observe significant higher cIMT values in obese boys and girls. In accordance to findings of Tounian et al. [5], Aggoun et al. [22], and Di Salvo et al. [23] our sample consisted of healthy children with no history of chronic disease. BP levels did not differ significantly between obese and normal weight children, none of the children was diagnosed with manifest hypertension.

The extent of obesity within the sample was 2.22 SDS in boys and 2.35 SDS in girls. Dangardt et al. [8] included obese children with BMI measures > 3 SDS, a significantly higher systolic and significantly lower diastolic BP, and found higher radial artery intimal thickening in obese participants. Giannini et al. [3] included participants with a BMI > 2 SDS and significantly higher systolic and diastolic BP than in lean controls. The coexistence of two risk factors, like hypertension and obesity [24] may lead to a higher increase in cIMT compared to healthy normal weight controls, which can explain non-significant differences in our study with obesity as only risk factor.

Significant differences in parameters of arterial stiffness in contrast to findings on cIMT may be explained with an earlier alteration of an artery’s function compared to its structural status [25]. Ep, β and PWV β were independently affected by BMI to a similar extent (Table 2), indicating stiffer arteries with increasing BMI values. AC in our sample, was higher in obese boys and girls compared to controls but did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with Chalmers et al. [9], Tryggestad et al. [11], and Lurbe et al. [10] who also observed increased compliance in obese children. Dangardt et al. [8] explain this higher compliance as chronic vasodilation caused by initial adaptation of the arterial system to a larger blood volume, generated by increased body fat mass. Tryggestad et al. [11] add that childhood obesity may cause an earlier peak in vascular compliance by obesity related acceleration of pubertal development. Chalmers et al. [9] claim the significantly higher pubertal status in their obese participants to be responsible for higher circulating insulin, leading to chronic vasodilation. According to the authors, this status remains until other risk factors contribute to the development of atherosclerosis – at this point the vessel wall surpasses a point of natural adaptation that results in decreased compliance and increased stiffness.

In this study, stiffness parameters in obese girls differed significantly from those in normal weight sex- and age-matched controls which is not the case in male participants. Marlatt et al. [26] did not find significantly sex differences for arterial stiffness parameters in normal weight children. Ahimastos et al. [13] took pubertal-status of children into account and found significantly stiffer arteries in pre-pubertal girls compared to age-matched males, but not in post-pubertal boys and girls. Sex steroid hormones are known to influence vessel structure and function. Hence, authors hypothesize a modulating effect of male and female sex steroids, causing a reduction in arterial stiffness in girls and an increased stiffness in boys during puberty. This may result in non-significantly different post-pubertal stiffness measures. For aortic PWV, Hidvegi et al. [27] have shown a steep increase during puberty in boys and girls, which starts about 2 years earlier in girls than in boys. This earlier development in girls and presence of obesity might be the reason for significantly higher stiffness measures in obese girls in our study and identifies them as being at higher risk for early signs of atherosclerosis. Though, results of our study support a sex specific approach to arterial distensibility with obese girls being at higher risk to develop early atherosclerosis.

Equivalent to aforementioned results, cIMT and AC were not significantly correlated to BMI, whereas arterial stiffness parameters (Ep, β and PWV β) were positively associated with BMI. This reveals Ep, β and PWV β as more sensitive parameters regarding overweight and obesity in children. An increased stiffness represents a functional impairment of the arterial wall, which occurs earlier than structural alterations, defined by an increased cIMT [28]. Increased arterial stiffness is present in children with familial hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and severe obesity [29–31]. Of all risk factors, the most obvious in the invisible atherosclerotic process is the growing number of overweight and obese children [32].

Conclusion

Detected early in life – by one single risk factor named obesity – children can immediately improve their vascular health by losing weight [8, 12]. A reduction in BMI slows the yearly increase in cIMT and improves CVD risk factors [33, 34]. Juonala et al. [35] reported age-appropriate cIMT values in normal weight adults, who had been obese in youth but lost overweight in adulthood. This study shows a significant association between BMI and parameters of arterial stiffness, especially in girls. As obesity tracks from child- into adulthood [36], with a strong association between childhood BMI and CVD in adulthood [2, 7, 37], it is of highest priority to start prevention as early as possible. Our results support a sex-based approach to prevention programmes, as obese girls are at higher risk than normal weight controls.

Abbreviations

β: 

stiffness index β

AC: 

arterial compliance

BMI: 

body-mass-index

BP: 

blood pressure

CCA: 

common carotid artery

cIMT: 

carotid intima-media thickness

CV: 

coefficient of variation

Ep: 

elastic modulus

PWV β: 

local pulse wave velocity β

SDS: 

standard deviation scores

Declarations

Acknowledgments

ᅟ

Funding

The study was funded by Sternstunden e.V. (non-profit organization) and the district office Berchtesgadener Land.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Preventive Pediatrics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
(2)
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

References

  1. Herouvi D, Karanasios E, Karayianni C, Karavanaki K. Cardiovascular disease in childhood: the role of obesity. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(6):721–32. doi:10.1007/s00431-013-1932-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS. Adolescent overweight is associated with adult overweight and related multiple cardiovascular risk factors: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Metab Clin Exp. 1996;45(2):235–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Giannini C, de Giorgis T, Scarinci A, Ciampani M, Marcovecchio ML, Chiarelli F, et al. Obese related effects of inflammatory markers and insulin resistance on increased carotid intima media thickness in pre-pubertal children. Atherosclerosis. 2008;197(1):448–56. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.06.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lamotte C, Iliescu C, Libersa C, Gottrand F. Increased intima-media thickness of the carotid artery in childhood: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170(6):719–29. doi:10.1007/s00431-010-1328-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tounian P, Aggoun Y, Dubern B, Varille V, Guy-Grand B, Sidi D, et al. Presence of increased stiffness of the common carotid artery and endothelial dysfunction in severely obese children: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358(9291):1400–4. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06525-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Joo Turoni C, Maranon RO, Felipe V, Bruno ME, Negrete A, Salas N, et al. Arterial stiffness and endothelial function in obese children and adolescents and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;80(4):281–6. doi:10.1159/000354991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dangardt F, Chen Y, Berggren K, Osika W, Friberg P. Increased rate of arterial stiffening with obesity in adolescents: a five-year follow-up study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57454. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057454.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dangardt F, Osika W, Volkmann R, Gan LM, Friberg P. Obese children show increased intimal wall thickness and decreased pulse wave velocity. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2008;28(5):287–93. doi:10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00806.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers LJ, Copeland KC, Hester CN, Fields DA, Gardner AW. Paradoxical increase in arterial compliance in obese pubertal children. Angiology. 2011;62(7):565–70. doi:10.1177/0003319711399117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lurbe E, Torro I, Garcia-Vicent C, Alvarez J, Fernandez-Fornoso JA, Redon J. Blood pressure and obesity exert independent influences on pulse wave velocity in youth. Hypertension. 2012;60(2):550–5. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.194746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tryggestad JB, Thompson DM, Copeland KC, Short KR. Obese children have higher arterial elasticity without a difference in endothelial function: the role of body composition. Obesity. 2012;20(1):165–71. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cote AT, Harris KC, Panagiotopoulos C, Sandor GG, Devlin AM. Childhood obesity and cardiovascular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1309–19. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ahimastos AA, Formosa M, Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Gender differences in large artery stiffness pre- and post puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5375–80. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rossi P, Frances Y, Kingwell BA, Ahimastos AA. Gender differences in artery wall biomechanical properties throughout life. J Hypertens. 2011;29(6):1023–33. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328344da5e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Weberruss H, Pirzer R, Bohm B, Elmenhorst J, Pozza RD, Netz H, et al. Increased intima-media thickness is not associated with stiffer arteries in children. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242(1):48–55. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.06.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kromeyer K, Wabitsch M, Kunze D, Geller F. Perzentile für den Body-Mass-Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde. 2001;149:807–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. WHO. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004–2006). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(1):75–80. doi:10.1159/000097034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. O'Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(5):426–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Neuhauser HK, Thamm M, Ellert U, Hense HW, Rosario AS. Blood pressure percentiles by age and height from nonoverweight children and adolescents in Germany. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):e978–88. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Aloka. Aloka Prosound a7. How to use. 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Aggoun Y, Farpour-Lambert NJ, Marchand LM, Golay E, Maggio AB, Beghetti M. Impaired endothelial and smooth muscle functions and arterial stiffness appear before puberty in obese children and are associated with elevated ambulatory blood pressure. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(6):792–9. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Salvo G, Pacileo G, Del Giudice EM, Natale F, Limongelli G, Verrengia M, et al. Abnormal myocardial deformation properties in obese, non-hypertensive children: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, standard echocardiographic, and strain rate imaging study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(22):2689–95. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iannuzzi A, Licenziati MR, Acampora C, Renis M, Agrusta M, Romano L, et al. Carotid artery stiffness in obese children with the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(4):528–31. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, Lonn E, Kendall CB, Mohler ER. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(2):93–111. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011. quiz 89–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Marlatt KL, Kelly AS, Steinberger J, Dengel DR. The influence of gender on carotid artery compliance and distensibility in children and adults. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013;41(6):340–6. doi:10.1002/jcu.22015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hidvegi EV, Illyes M, Benczur B, Bocskei RM, Ratgeber L, Lenkey Z, et al. Reference values of aortic pulse wave velocity in a large healthy population aged between 3 and 18 years. J Hypertens. 2012;30(12):2314–21. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328359562c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Urbina EM, Williams RV, Alpert BS, Collins RT, Daniels SR, Hayman L, et al. Noninvasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in children and adolescents: recommendations for standard assessment for clinical research: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2009;54(5):919–50. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.192639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Aggoun Y, Bonnet D, Sidi D, Girardet JP, Brucker E, Polak M, et al. Arterial Mechanical Changes in Children With Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(9):2070–5. doi:10.1161/01.atv.20.9.2070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Giannattasio C, Failla M, Piperno A, Grappiolo A, Gamba P, Paleari F, et al. Early impairment of large artery structure and function in type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1999;42(8):987–94. doi:10.1007/s001250051257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iannuzzi A, Licenziati MR, Acampora C, Salvatore V, Auriemma L, Romano ML, et al. Increased carotid intima-media thickness and stiffness in obese children. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2506–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Engelen L, Ferreira I, Stehouwer CD, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S. Reference Values for Arterial Measurements C. Reference intervals for common carotid intima-media thickness measured with echotracking: relation with risk factors. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(30):2368–80. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Markus RA, Mack WJ, Azen SP, Hodis HN. Influence of lifestyle modification on atherosclerotic progression determined by ultrasonographic change in the common carotid intima-media thickness. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4):1000–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tounian P, Frelut ML, Parlier G, Abounaufal C, Aymard N, Veinberg F, et al. Weight loss and changes in energy metabolism in massively obese adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(8):830–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Juonala M, Raitakari M. J SAV, Raitakari OT. Obesity in youth is not an independent predictor of carotid IMT in adulthood. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Atherosclerosis. 2006;185(2):388–93. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.06.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Berenson GS. Bogalusa Heart Study g. Health consequences of obesity. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58(1):117–21. doi:10.1002/pbc.23373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Baker JL, Olsen LW, Sorensen TI. Childhood body-mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2329–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa072515.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Weberruß et al. 2016

Advertisement

BMC Obesity

ISSN: 2052-9538

Contact us